Skip to content

BIA in BCM – Target/Actual Comparison & Reporting🔗

The Target/Actual Comparison of the BIA summarises the results of the Business Impact Analysis and compares them with the current implementation status.

The goal is to quickly identify:

  • where defined recovery objectives (target) have already been implemented,
  • where gaps remain (actual < target),
  • which measures need to be prioritised.

Typical Use Cases🔗

  • Management Reporting
    Overview: "Which critical processes still lack an adequate BCM status?"

  • Preparation for Audits and Certifications
    Evidence: "We have identified the critical processes, defined objectives, and assessed the degree of implementation."

  • BCM Programme Steering
    Planning: "Which areas of action must we prioritise next year to achieve our target objectives?"

Filters and Evaluations🔗

The target/actual comparison is well suited for filtered views, for example:

  • Only processes with a target RTO ≤ X hours

Connection to Strategies, Plans, and Risks🔗

The target/actual comparison bridges to:

  • BCM Strategies and Plans
    → Ensuring that defined RTO/MTPD can actually be achieved.

  • BCM Risk Management
    → A large target/actual gap may indicate additional risks or necessary measures.

  • Audit Management
    → Audits can be specifically focused on areas with target/actual deviations.

This makes the target/actual comparison a central steering instrument for your BCM programme.

The detailed work is carried out in:

In this way, the target/actual comparison closes the loop between BIA, strategies, measures, and practical BCM operations.